Andrich v. Arpaio et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|August 2, 2017
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Time to Certify A.R.S. §§ 12- 2603(a); 12-2604 (Doc. 40 ) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before August 18, 2017, Plaintiff shall provide the required certification regarding whether expert testimony is necessary in this case with regard to his negligence and malpractice claims. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff certifies that expert testimony is not necessary, Defendants shall have until September 1, 20 17 to file a Motion requesting the Court order Plaintiff to provide a Preliminary Expert Affidavit in compliance with § 12-2603(D). If Plaintiff certifies that expert testimony is necessary, Plaintiff shall have until October 2, 2017 to provi de the required Preliminary Expert Affidavit as required by § 12-2603(B). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Serve Additional Uniform Interrogatories Upon Defendants (Doc. 42 ) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED tha t Plaintiff shall modify and reserve his written discovery requests on or before August 11, 2017. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Strike (Doc. 56 ) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Extend the deadline for moving to amend pleadings (Doc. 60 ) is granted as provided in this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all motions to join parties or for leave to amend pleadings shall be filed by September 4, 2017. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that with the exception of the Court's extension of the deadline for the parties to move to amend pleadings as stated above, Plaintiff's Motion to Modify Scheduling Order (Doc. 62 ) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Compel (Doc. 65 ) is denied. (See document for further details). Signed by Magistrate Judge John Z Boyle on 8/2/17. (SLQ)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?