Alonso v. Ryan et al
| Christopher M Alonso |
| Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| 2:2016cv02143 |
| June 29, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Navajo |
| John Z Boyle (PS) |
| James A Teilborg |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
ORDER (Amended) - The 87 Report and Recommendation is accepted.The 98 objections are overruled. The Clerk of the Court shall enter an amended judgment denying and dismissing the Amended Petition, with prejudice. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that pur suant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court denies issuance of a certificate of appealability because dismissal of portions of the petition is based on a plain procedural bar and j urists would not find this Court's procedural ruling debatable, see Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000), and Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, see 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 6/11/18. (MSA) Modified on 6/12/2018 (SJF).
|
|
Filing
108
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that, except to the extent this Court's prior order is clarified, the Motion for Relief from Judgment, (Docs. 104 and 105 ), is DENIED. Amended Order to follow. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability on this Rule 60(b) motion is DENIED [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 6/11/18. (MAW)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER: The Report and Recommendation 87 is accepted. The objections 98 are overruled. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment denying and dismissing the Amended Petition, with prejudice. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court denies issuance of a certificate of appealability because dismissal of portions of the petition is based on a plain procedural bar and jurists would not find this Court's procedural ruling debatable, and Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 3/08/2018. (REK)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 85 ) is accepted to the limited extent that the motion for clarification or for stay in abeyance (Doc. 10 ) is denied. Petitioner's factual objections found in Doc. 86 are deemed moot, without prejudice to Petitioner reasserting them, if relevant, should he object to the Report and Recommendation filed on August 10, 2017 [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 8/15/17. (MAW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
