De La Fuente v. Arizona, State of et al
| Roque De La Fuente |
| Arizona, State of, Michele Reagan and Unknown Parties |
| 2:2016cv02419 |
| July 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| John Z Boyle |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
ORDER granting 55 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 58 ) is denied and Defendant's Daubert Motion (Doc. 78 ) and Motion to Strike (Doc. 85 ) are denied as moot. The Clerk shall enter judgment for Defendant, and against Plaintiff, on all counts of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 54 ), and terminate this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Z Boyle on 6/10/19. (DXD)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend (Doc. 11 ) is denied; that Defendant Reagan's Partial Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 7 ) is granted. Plaintiffs claim for injunctive relief in the form of an order requiring that he be placed on the 2016 presidential ballot is dismissed; and that Defendants shall answer the remainder of Plaintiff's Complaint within the time frame provided by Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Z Boyle on 1/9/17.(KGM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
