McCoy v. Petwin Hayden LLC

Plaintiff: Robert McCoy
Defendant: Petwin Hayden LLC
Case Number: 2:2016cv02795
Filed: August 19, 2016
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: James A Teilborg
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12181
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 27, 2016 29 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Doc. 19 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 20 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file the Proposed Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 20-1) within 14 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 12/27/2016. (REK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McCoy v. Petwin Hayden LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert McCoy
Represented By: Robert Stalnaker Reder(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Petwin Hayden LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?