Allen v. American Capital Limited et al
| Charlisa Allen |
| American Capital Limited, Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Scientific Protein Laboratories LLC and Unknown Party |
| 2:2016cv02876 |
| August 29, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| James A Teilborg |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
193
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Scientific Protein Laboratories' Motion that Portions of Certain Exhibits Remain Under Seal, (Doc. 186 ), is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; the Clerk of the Court shall file under seal Doc. 187 and Doc. 187-1 [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 12/22/17. (MAW)
|
|
Filing
180
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the Motions to Seal (Docs. 172 and 173 ) are denied. The lodged documents at Docs. 174, 175, 176, and 177 are stricken but may remain under seal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall comply with this Order by Monday, November 13, 2017 [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 11/7/17.(MAW)
|
|
Filing
73
Order: Plaintiff's motion to transfer this case to the District of Arizona (Doc. 70 ) be, and the same hereby is granted. Judge James G. Carr on 8/29/16.(C,D) [Transferred from ohnd on 8/29/2016.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
