Russell et al v. Swick Mining Services USA Incorporated et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 5, 2017
ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED denying Plaintiffs Wendell Russell, Michael Oelke, Ricky Rowland, and Randy McGraths, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Combined Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, Extension of Tim e to Complete Discovery, for Preliminary Injunction, and for Sanctions (Doc. 64 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties meet and confer regarding the proposed language of a Second Corrective Notice to be issued in compliance with this Order. The parties shall submit joint or competing proposals for such language by July 21, 2017. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED extending the opt-in period identified in this Court's previous Order (Doc. 49 ) to 60 days after Plaintiffs mail the Second Corrective Notice discussed above. (See document for full details). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 7/5/17. (LAD)
|April 14, 2017
ORDER granting Plaintiffs Wendell Russell, Michael Oelke, Ricky Rowland, and Randy McGrath's Motion to Amend Scheduling Order (Doc. 27 ). Plaintiffs shall file its Amended Complaint on the docket by April 19, 2017. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED grantin g Plaintiffs' Motion for Conditional Collective Action Certification (Doc. 33 ). Plaintiffs' Notice and Consent forms shall be written and sent in compliance with this Order. Plaintiffs' counsel will serve as interim class counsel. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 4/14/17.(KGM)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?