McCauley et al v. Najafi et al
| Bill McCauley and Edward D Kendler |
| Jahm J Najafi, Cheryl Najafi, Kevin M Weiss, Elizabeth S Weiss, David P Franke, Stephanie M Rankin Franke, James D Staudohar, Kathleen M Staudohar, Scott Wiley and Gail E Wiley |
| 2:2016cv03461 |
| October 11, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Steven P Logan |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
*ORDER: Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration 78 is denied. See order for details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 4/30/2020. (LMR) *Modified document from Standard to Written Opinion on 5/1/2020 (EJA).
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER: Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice 64 is denied. The Motion to Dismiss 63 is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiffs' control person claim under A.R.S. § 44-1999(b)(Count Three) shall be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiffs' request for relief in the form of rescission shall be dismissed with prejudice. All other claims remain. The Clerk's Office shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 3/24/2020. (REK)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER granting 28 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. The Clerk of Court shall terminate this action. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 09/29/2017.(KAS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
