Cramer #124771 v. Arizona, State of et al
| David Cramer |
| Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan |
| 2:2016cv03522 |
| October 14, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pinal |
| Bridget S Bade (PS) |
| James A Teilborg |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER granting 50 Defendant's motion for sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall reject any future filings from Petitioner or purporting to be on behalf of Petitioner in this closed case. [See attached order for additional information.] Signed by Senior Judge James A. Teilborg on 6/10/2019. (RMW)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER ADOPTING 29 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; the objections (Doc. 30 ) are overruled; the amended petition (Doc. 10 ) is denied and dismissed with prejudice and the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the motion to seal (Doc. 15 ) is denied; that the motion to stay (Doc. 27 ) is denied; and that the motion for summary judgment (Doc. 33 ) is denied. In the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court denies issuance of a certificate of appealability because dismissal of the petition is based on a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find this Court'sprocedural ruling debatable. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 05/22/2017. (KAS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
