Winters v. Arizona, State of

Plaintiff: Tanya Winters
Defendant: Arizona, State of
Case Number: 2:2016cv03542
Filed: October 13, 2016
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Gila
Presiding Judge: David G Campbell
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 5, 2016 11 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that Plaintiff's amended complaint (Doc. 8 ) is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of pro bono counsel (Doc. 10 ) is denied. Plaintiff shall have until December 23, 2016 to file a second amended complaint. The Clerk of Court shall terminate this action without further order of the Court if Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint by December 23, 2016. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 12/5/16. (KGM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Winters v. Arizona, State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tanya Winters
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arizona, State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?