LREP Arizona LLC v. 597 Broadway Realty LP et al
| LREP Arizona LLC |
| 597 Broadway Realty LP, Shui Yee Lee, Unknown Lee, Sabeth I Siddique and Unknown Siddique |
| 2:2016cv04015 |
| November 18, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| Contract: Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 71 Motion to Dismiss Defendants' counterclaims. FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot Defendants' 89 Motion to Amend counterclaim and file a third-party complaint in light of the Court's determination that Defendants waived their rights to challenge their guaranties or the allegations made against them in this lawsuit. (See Order for details.) Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 3/27/2019. (MMO)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER granting 36 Rule 60 Motion to Vacate Judgment. The Clerk's judgment (Doc. 18 ) is VACATED and the Clerk is directed to reopen this case. Plaintiff's request for an order directing garnishee Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. to liquidate certain securities and disburse the proceeds to Plaintiff (Doc. 45 ) is DENIED as moot in light of this order. Plaintiff shall serve Defendants with the summons and complaint by no later than 4/27/2018 and file proof thereof with the Court. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 4/10/18. (DXD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
