Torgyik v. GMPH One Incorporated

Torgyik v. GMPH One Incorporated

Plaintiff:	Sandor Torgyik
Defendant:	GMPH One Incorporated
Case Number:	2:2016cv04431
Filed:	December 16, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Phoenix Division Office
County:	Maricopa
Presiding Judge:	Diane J Humetewa
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 623
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 2, 2019	Filing 101 AMENDED ORDER that Defendant's 88 Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law is DENIED. ORDERED that Defendant's 89 Motion for a New Trial is DENIED. ORDERED that Plaintiff's 85 Motion for Final Judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant on Plaintiff' s ADEA claim in the amount of $44,109.30 in back pay and $2,898.54 in prejudgment interest for a total judgment amount of $ 47,007.84. The Court further awards Plaintiff post-judgment interest on all applicable amounts in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1961 from the date this judgment is entered until paid at the rate of 2.44% per annum. ORDERED that Plain tiff is awarded $47,007.84 in liquidated damages and $3,287.92 in court costs. Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys' 83 Fees is GRANTED. Plaintiff is entitled to attorney fees in the amount of $31,780.00. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 4/2/2019. (See Order for details.) (LFIG)
March 31, 2019	Filing 99 ORDER that Defendant's 88 Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law is DENIED. ORDERED that Defendant's 89 Motion for a New Trial is DENIED.ORDERED that Plaintiff's 85 Motion for Final Judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant on Plaintiff' s ADEA claim in the amount of $44,109.30 in back pay and $2,898.54 in prejudgment interest for a total judgment amount of $47,007.84. The Co urt further awards Plaintiff post-judgment interest on all applicable amounts in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1961 from the date this judgment is entered until paid at the rate of 2.44% per annum. ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded $ 23,503.92 in liquidated damages and $3,287.92 in court costs. Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys' 83 Fees is GRANTED. Plaintiff is entitled to attorney fees in the amount of $31,780.00. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 3/31/2019. (See Order for details.) (LFIG)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 2, 2019

Filing 101 AMENDED ORDER that Defendant's 88 Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law is DENIED. ORDERED that Defendant's 89 Motion for a New Trial is DENIED. ORDERED that Plaintiff's 85 Motion for Final Judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant on Plaintiff' s ADEA claim in the amount of $44,109.30 in back pay and $2,898.54 in prejudgment interest for a total judgment amount of $ 47,007.84. The Court further awards Plaintiff post-judgment interest on all applicable amounts in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1961 from the date this judgment is entered until paid at the rate of 2.44% per annum. ORDERED that Plain tiff is awarded $47,007.84 in liquidated damages and $3,287.92 in court costs. Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys' 83 Fees is GRANTED. Plaintiff is entitled to attorney fees in the amount of $31,780.00. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 4/2/2019. (See Order for details.) (LFIG)

March 31, 2019

Filing 99 ORDER that Defendant's 88 Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law is DENIED. ORDERED that Defendant's 89 Motion for a New Trial is DENIED.ORDERED that Plaintiff's 85 Motion for Final Judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant on Plaintiff' s ADEA claim in the amount of $44,109.30 in back pay and $2,898.54 in prejudgment interest for a total judgment amount of $47,007.84. The Co urt further awards Plaintiff post-judgment interest on all applicable amounts in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1961 from the date this judgment is entered until paid at the rate of 2.44% per annum. ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded $ 23,503.92 in liquidated damages and $3,287.92 in court costs. Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys' 83 Fees is GRANTED. Plaintiff is entitled to attorney fees in the amount of $31,780.00. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 3/31/2019. (See Order for details.) (LFIG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Torgyik v. GMPH One Incorporated
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sandor Torgyik
Represented By:	Joshua William Carden
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: GMPH One Incorporated
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?