Hayford v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al
Terri Hayford |
Nationstar Mortgage LLC and Aerotek Incorporated |
2:2016cv04480 |
December 20, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Maricopa |
John J Tuchi |
Fair Labor Standards Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 ORDER: granting in part and denying in part Defendant Nationstar Mortgage LLC's Motion to Dismiss, Strike Collective Action Claims, and Compel Arbitration, or in the Alternative to Stay Proceedings 12 and compelling arbitration of Plaintiff 39;s claim against Nationstar in this matter under the terms of the Arbitration Policy; staying Plaintiff's claim against Nationstar in this matter pending a decision by the arbitrator; the parties shall file a joint status report within one week of the arbitrator's decision or by 9/15/17, whichever is sooner. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 3/3/17. (REW) |
Filing 27 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED denying 25 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff has missed the deadline to respond to Defendant Nationstar Mortgage, LLC's Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendant Aerotek, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 23 ) by March 3, 2017. (See attached Order for complete details). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 2/28/17.(JAMA) Modified on 3/1/2017 to add WO (JAMA). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.