Vijan #184869 v. Corizon Health Services et al
| Masum Vijan |
| Corizon Health Services, Unknown Malachinski, Unknown Ende, Unknown Smalley, Unknown Elijah, T Dannerviller and Julia Barnett |
| 2:2016cv04513 |
| December 22, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Michelle H Burns (PS) |
| David G Campbell |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER - The reference to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn as to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 32 ). Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 32 ) is granted as to Defendant Elijah. The Motion is denied as to Defen dants Dannemiller and Smalley. Elijah is dismissed as a Defendant. This action is referred to Magistrate Judge Deborah M. Fine to conduct a settlement conference. Defense Counsel shall arrange for the relevant Parties to jointly call Magistrate Judge Fine's chambers at (602) 322-7630 within 14 days to schedule a date for the settlement conference. See document for complete details. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 8/13/2019. (RMV)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Plaintiff=s claims against Defendant Henley are dismissed without prejudice. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 5/9/18. (LAD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
