Garcia #243523 v. Ryan et al
| Roberto Ramirez Garcia |
| Charles L Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Mark Brnovich |
| 2:2016cv04517 |
| December 22, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Yuma |
| Deborah M Fine |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER: Magistrate Judge Duncan's R&R 17 is ACCEPTED. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma paupe ris on appeal are DENIED because dismissal of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the ruling debatable. The Clerk of Court shall terminate this case. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 12/20/2017. (REK)
|
|
Filing
17
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that Roberto Ramirez Garcia's Petitionfor Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied and dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that a Certificate of Appealability be denied because dismi ssal of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the ruling debatable. This recommendation is not an order that is immediately appealable to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Any notice of appeal p ursuant to Rule 4(a)(1), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, should not be filed until entry of the District Court's judgment. The parties shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of service of a copy of this recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the Court. Thereafter, the parties have fourteen (14) days within which to file a response to the objections. Failure to timely file objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation may result in the acceptance of the Report and Recommendation by the District Court without further review. Failure to timely file objections to any factual determinations of the Magistrate Judge will be considered a waiver of a party's right to appellate review of the findings of fact in an order or judgment entered pursuant to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge David K Duncan on 10/31/2017. (REK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
