Dixon v. USA
Petitioner: Julius Darnell Dixon
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 2:2016cv04590
Filed: June 24, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: Bridget S Bade
Presiding Judge: Susan R Bolton
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER ADOPTING 15 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. ORDERED overruling Movant's Objections to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 26 ). The previously imposed Order staying this matter be lifted. (Doc. [1 2]) ORDERED denying and dismissing Movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 with prejudice (Doc. 3 ). ORDERED denying a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because Movant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 12/6/18. (EJA)
May 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER ADOPTING 11 the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as the Order of this Court. ORDERED granting Respondent/Plaintiff's 6 Motion to Stay Further Proceedings on the Motion to Vacate Sentence. FURTHER ORDERED this matter is stayed pending the Supreme Courts decision in Lynch v. Dimaya, No. 15-1498 and the Ninth Circuit's decision in United States v. Begay, No. 14-10080. Signed by Judge Susan R Bolton on 5/30/17. (EJA)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?