Bey v. Gialketsis

Bey v. Gialketsis

Plaintiff:	Navel Al-Luenig Bey
Defendant:	Cynthia Gialketsis
Case Number:	2:2017cv00081
Filed:	January 10, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Phoenix Division Office
County:	Maricopa
Presiding Judge:	John J Tuchi
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 20, 2017	Filing 17 ORDER DISMISSING Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 11 ) with prejudice and denying Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Rule 19 Joinder of Parties (Doc. 15 ) as moot. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 04/20/2017. (KAS)
January 25, 2017	Filing 6 ORDER that Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 1 ) is dismissed. Plaintiff may file an Amended Complaint that complies with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than 30 days from the date of this Order. If no Amended Complaint is timely file d, the Clerk shall dismiss this action without further Order of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED striking Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. 2 ) because Plaintiff provided insufficient detail for the Court to determine his ability to pay fees. If Plaintiff files an Amended Complaint, Plaintiff may either file an Amended Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs containing the required information, or pay the Court's filing fee. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 1/25/17. (KGM)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 20, 2017

Filing 17 ORDER DISMISSING Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 11 ) with prejudice and denying Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Rule 19 Joinder of Parties (Doc. 15 ) as moot. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 04/20/2017. (KAS)

January 25, 2017

Filing 6 ORDER that Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 1 ) is dismissed. Plaintiff may file an Amended Complaint that complies with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than 30 days from the date of this Order. If no Amended Complaint is timely file d, the Clerk shall dismiss this action without further Order of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED striking Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. 2 ) because Plaintiff provided insufficient detail for the Court to determine his ability to pay fees. If Plaintiff files an Amended Complaint, Plaintiff may either file an Amended Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs containing the required information, or pay the Court's filing fee. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 1/25/17. (KGM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bey v. Gialketsis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Navel Al-Luenig Bey
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Cynthia Gialketsis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?