Al-Zurwayjawi v. Gurule
Petitioner: Qusay Al-Zurwayjawi
Respondent: Jon Gurule
Case Number: 2:2017cv00101
Filed: January 11, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Pinal
Presiding Judge: John Z Boyle
Presiding Judge: Diane J Humetewa
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 12 ). The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 1 ) is denied and dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall terminate this action and enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 07/05/2017. (KAS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Al-Zurwayjawi v. Gurule
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Qusay Al-Zurwayjawi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jon Gurule
Represented By: Katherine R Branch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?