Ramos et al v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage et al
| Bonnie T Ramos and Leo Ramos |
| Wells Fargo Home Mortgage and America's Servicing Company |
| 2:2017cv00316 |
| January 31, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| G Murray Snow |
| Truth in Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
101
ORDER that 78 Defendant Wells Fargo Home Mortgage's Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Wells Fargo Home Mortgage's Motion for Sanctions 87 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Wells F argo Home Mortgage's Motion in Limine regarding adjudicated claims 94 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Wells Fargo Home Mortgage's Motion in Limine regarding post-discovery disclosures 95 is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Bonnie T. Ramos's Demand for Jury Trial 27 is STRICKEN. [See attached order for additional information.] Signed by Chief Judge G. Murray Snow on 6/28/2019. (RMW)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER: Defendant Wells Fargo Home Mortgage's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 43 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. The Motion is DENIED regarding Ramos' Good Samaritan claim that Wells Fargo is liable under the Good S amaritan doctrine because it misfiled the Affidavit of Cancellation of Trustee's Deed by "not recording it against [Ramos'] deed." 2. The Motion is GRANTED on all of Ramos' other claims. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Bonnie T. Ramos' Cross Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 66 ) is DENIED. (See Order for further details). Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 3/26/2019. (SST)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 13 is granted in part and denied in part as follows: Count One alleging tortious breach of the implied vonvenant of good faith and fair dealing is DISMISSED. County Two alleging negligent performance of an undertaking, also known as a violation of Arizona's Good Samaritan Doctrine, is NOT DISMISSED. Count Three alleging negligent or intentional misrepresentation is DISMISSED only as to the negligent misrepresentation claim. The intentional misrepresentation claim survives. Count Four alleging a tortious breach of the TILA is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 9/11/2017. (REK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
