Laird v. Ryan et al
| Kenneth Jeremy Laird |
| Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| 2:2017cv00482 |
| February 14, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Bridget S Bade (PS) |
| James A Teilborg |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - IT IS ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 32 ) is accepted except as specified in the order; the objections (Doc. 33 ) are overruled or sustained as specified in the order; the Petition for Writ of Habeas corpus is denied, with prejudice, and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is granted as to Petitioner's sole claim for relief regarding his sentencing (see Doc. 1 at 7-8). (See document for complete details). Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 8/29/18. (SLQ)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER ACCEPTING 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The motion to stay (Doc. 3 ) is granted. No later than June 26, 2017, Petitioner must inform the Court of the status of his proceeding in state court. Every 90 days after the filing of the initial status report Petitioner must file a report regarding the status of the state court proceedings and must file a notice within thirty days after the state court review is completed. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 05/24/2017. (KAS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
