Syntelco Limited v. Reish

Plaintiff: Syntelco Limited
Defendant: Robert Reish
Case Number: 2:2017cv00598
Filed: February 28, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: XX Outside US
Presiding Judge: John Z Boyle
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 4, 2019 Filing 81 ORDER: Plaintiff AMOD's 78 Motion for Summary Judgment against Defendant Reish is granted. The Clerk is to enter judgment in favor of AMOD and against Defendant Reish as to AMOD's Breach of Contract Claim in Count One of the SAC. AMOD i s awarded $2.1 million in damages to be paid by Defendant Reish. On or before June 21, 2019, AMOD may submit a motion seeking reasonable attorneys' fees and costs accrued in this action from Defendant Reish pursuant to Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-341.01(A) ("In any contested action arising out of a contract, express or implied, the court may award the successful party reasonable attorney fees."). Signed by Magistrate Judge John Z Boyle on 5/31/19. (GMP)
March 19, 2019 Filing 80 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the Cannon's Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 69 ) is denied. (See document for complete details). Signed by Magistrate Judge John Z Boyle on 3/19/19. (SLQ)
August 14, 2018 Filing 68 AMENDED ORDER - The Cannon's Motion to Dismiss (doc. 43 ) is granted as to the following claims: Reish's fraud claims pertaining to helicopters other than the 41FF (see doc. 23 ) are dismissed without prejudice as inappropriate for impl eader under Rule 14(a). Reish's contribution claim is dismissed without prejudice because, as currently plead, the claim necessarily fails. As to all remaining claims in the TPC (doc. 23 ), the Cannons' Motion to Dismiss (doc. 43 ) is denied. The Cannons' Motion for Attorneys' fees (doc. 43 ) is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Z Boyle on 08/14/2018. (KAS)
July 9, 2018 Filing 62 ORDER granting in part 43 Motion to Dismiss Counts/Claims as to the following: Reish's fraud claims pertaining to helicopters other than the 41FF (see Doc. 23 , 1-108) is dismissed without prejudice as inappropriate for impleader under Rul e 14(a); Reish's contribution claim (id., 115-18) is dismissed without prejudice because, as currently plead, the claim necessarily fails. All remaining claims in the TPC (Doc. 23 ), the Cannons' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 43 ) is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Z Boyle on 7/9/18. (DXD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Syntelco Limited v. Reish
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Syntelco Limited
Represented By: Steven Martin Aaron
Represented By: Amy Diana Barry
Represented By: Andrew M Legolvan
Represented By: Michael J Sullivan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Reish
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?