Parker v. Arizona, State of et al
| Matthew V Parker |
| Arizona, State of and Mark Brnovich |
| 2:2017cv00887 |
| March 24, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
170
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Parker's motion for reconsideration (Doc. 166 ) is denied; and (2) Defendants' motion to strike (Doc. 168 ) is denied [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 6/24/19. (MAW)
|
|
Filing
165
AMENDED ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 117 ) is granted in part and denied part; (2) Parker's motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. 119 ) is denied; (3) Parker's motion for attorney's fees (Doc. 121 ) is granted in part and denied in part; and (4) Parker is awarded $2,100 in attorney's fees [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 5/13/19. (MAW)
|
|
Filing
163
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 117 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, denying 119 Parker's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and granting in part and denying in part 121 Parker's Motion for Attorney Fees. Parker is awarded $2,100 in attorney's fees. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 5/7/19. (DXD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
