Danzik et al v. CWT Canada II Limited Partnership et al
| Dennis M Danzik and RDX Technologies Corporation |
| CWT Canada II Limited Partnership, Resource Recovery Corporation, Changing World Technologies Incorporated, Jean Noelting, Unknown Noelting, Bruce MacFarlane, Unknown MacFarlane, Brian Appel and Unknown Appel |
| 2:2017cv00969 |
| March 31, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| James A Teilborg |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that within 30 days of service on all Defendants, Defendants and Plaintiffs shall file a joint supplement regarding jurisdiction which must include: 1) an allegation of the citizenship of CWT Canada II Limited Partnership base d on actual knowledge; and 2) a brief regarding whether this Court must consider the country of citizenship of foreign parties for purposes of determining whether complete diversity exists [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 6/20/17. (MAW)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file a supplement to the complaint by June 16, 2017 properly alleging federal subject matter jurisdiction or this case will be dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 6/9/17. (MAW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
