Salazar v. Ryan et al
| David Anthony Salazar |
| Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| 2:2017cv01132 |
| April 14, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Mohave |
| James F Metcalf (PS) |
| James A Teilborg |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 28 ) is accepted and adopted; the objections (Doc. 31 ) are overruled. The Petition is denied with prejudice, and the Clerk of the Court shall ente r judgment accordingly. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court denies issuance of a certificate of appealability, because dismissal of the Petition is based on a plain procedural bar, and jurists of reason would not find this Court's procedural ruling debatable. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Further, Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). (See document for complete details). Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 5/29/18. (SLQ)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER denying 24 Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration filed by David Anthony Salazar. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 01/17/2018. (KAS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
