Rodriguez v. Brooks et al
| Alberto Rodriguez |
| William Brooks, Jason West, Heather Froese, Kimberly Kros, Todd C Owen, Kevin K McAleenan and John F Kelly |
| 2:2017cv01200 |
| April 21, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Neil V Wake |
| Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 30 ) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff Alberto Rodriguez against Defendants in their official capacity that the September 10, 2016 denial of Plaintiffs security clearance (Doc. 1-2 at 1-2), Acting Port Director Jason West's October 7, 2016 order denying Plaintiff's appeal (Doc. 1-4 at 1), and Directorof Field Operations William K. Brooks' ;s November 8, 2016 order denying Plaintiff's further appeal (Doc. 1-6 at 1) are reversed as invalid and his application is remanded for further action consistent with this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for an Order to Show Cause Why Defendants Should Not Be Held in Civil Contempt (Doc. 32 ), treated as a motion for award of attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court retains jurisdiction to decide any further judicial review proceedings that may be brought from proceedings on remand. (See document for complete details). Signed by Senior Judge Neil V Wake on 8/24/18. (SLQ)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER re: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 22 . IT IS ORDERED the motion is granted with respect to Plaintiff's claims for mandamus, declaratory relief, violation of due process, and substantive judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act. The Motion is otherwise DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants file an Answer by 6/22/2018. See attached Order for additional information. Signed by Senior Judge Neil V. Wake on 6/8/2018. (RMW)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER: The Order 6 of 4/24/2017 setting a hearing on the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order/Preliminary Injunction 3 is vacated and the hearing is vacated. Plaintiff show cause by 5/12/2017 why this action should not be dismissed. See order for additional details. Signed by Senior Judge Neil V Wake on 4/25/2017. (LMR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
