De La Torre #218066 v. Ryan et al
| Andres De La Torre |
| Charles L Ryan, Wayne Mooney, Unknown Harris and Unknown Kingsland |
| 2:2017cv01230 |
| April 26, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| John Z Boyle (PS) |
| John J Tuchi |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (doc. 16 ) is denied. 2. Plaintiff's Motions for Amendment of the Scheduling Order (docs. 14 , 19 ) are granted in part. 3. The Court will extend the following deadlines: a. All inte rrogatories, requests for production of documents, and requests for admissions shall be served no later than May 25, 2018. b. All motions regarding discovery must be filed no later than June 26, 2018. c. Dispositive motions shall be filed no later th an July 26, 2018. Such motions must fully comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. 4. All other deadlines in the Court's September 27, 2017 Scheduling Order (doc. 13 ) are affirmed. 5. Plaintiff's Motion for Ruling (doc. 24 ) is granted to the extent discussed in this order. (See document for complete details). Signed by Magistrate Judge John Z Boyle on 4/6/18. (SLQ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
