Schroeder et al v. Brennan
| Sonja Schroeder and Daniel Walker |
| Megan J Brennan |
| 2:2017cv01301 |
| May 2, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| John J Tuchi |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED granting in part and denying in part Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 74 ). Defendant is not entitled to summary judgment on Plaintiff's Title VII retaliation claim but is entitled to summary judgment on Plaintiff's request for equitable damages. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will set a pretrial status conference by separate order. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 9/10/19. (JAMA)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED denying Defendant Megan J. Brennan's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 72 ). (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 9/6/19. (JAMA)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER granting 9 Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss. FURTHER ORDERED dismissing Plaintiff's hostile work environment claim in Count One of the Complaint. Discovery shall continue as to the retaliation claim embodied in Count Two of the Complaint according to the scheduling Order set forth in this matter. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 12/4/17.(EJA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
