Gillard et al v. Good Earth Power AZ LLC et al
Martin Gillard and Darren Gurner |
Good Earth Power AZ LLC, ZR FEC Limited, Jason Rosamond, Maya Minkova and Alawi Zawawi |
2:2017cv01368 |
May 4, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
XX Outside US |
Douglas L Rayes |
Fair Labor Standards Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 103 *ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 67 Motion for Summary Judgment. Granted with respect to Defendants Rosamond and Minkova; denied with respect to Defendants GEPAZ and ZR FEC. FURTHER ORDERED denying Defendants' [68 ] Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs' FLSA claim. FURTHER ORDERED denying Defendants' 69 Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs' AWA claims. The parties shall appear telephonically on 3/26/2019 at 2:00 PM before Judge Douglas L. Rayes to discuss setting a trial date and other pre-trial deadlines. (See Order for details.) Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 3/19/2019. (MMO) *Modified to add WO on 3/20/2019 (SLQ). |
Filing 75 ORDER granting 39 FEC Logging USA Holdings, LLC's Motion to Dismiss. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' request for leave to amend (Doc. 46 at 4) is DENIED without prejudice. If Plaintiffs wish to renew their request, theymust do so by no later than 7/3/2018. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 6/26/2018. (MMO) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.