Upton v. Corizon Health Care Incorporated et al
William Lanny Upton |
Corizon Health Care Incorporated and Unknown Parties |
2:2017cv01502 |
May 17, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Pinal |
Michelle H Burns |
James A Teilborg |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 63 ORDER denying 36 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint. To the extent the new count(s) attempted to be added by Plaintiff's proposed amendment are freestanding claims, the Court denies leave to amend without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new case premised on the new claim(s) identified in the proposed amendment. Additionally, this Order makes no ruling on whether the evidence underlying the new claim(s) in Plaintiff's proposed amendment is admissible in the trial of this case. [See attached order for further information.] Signed by Senior Judge James A. Teilborg on 2/12/2019. (RMW) |
Filing 55 ORDER re: 36 Motion to Amend Complaint: IT IS ORDERED that Defendant file a surreply by Monday, 2/11/2019 at 8:00 a.m. responding to the new arguments raised in Plaintiff's Reply (Doc. 54 ) and discussing specifically what further d iscovery or preparation Defendant will need if the Court were to grant Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint (Doc. 36 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all deadlines respective to trial remain in force at this time. (See attached order for additional information.) Signed by Senior Judge James A. Teilborg on 2/5/2019. (RMW) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.