Pandeli v. Ryan et al
| Darrel Peter Pandeli |
| Charles L Ryan and James O'Neil |
| 2:2017cv01657 |
| May 30, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pinal |
| John J Tuchi |
| Death Penalty |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
123
ORDER denying 118 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 1/6/23. (SMF)
|
|
Filing
117
ORDER granting 114 Motion to Stay. This action is stayed and held in abeyance pending exhaustion of Claim1 of Pandeli's habeas petition. Pandeli's request for federal habeas counsel to represent him in state court is granted and denied in part as discussed herein. See Order for further details. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 11/10/22. (DXD)
|
|
Filing
113
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting Pandeli's Motion for Leave to File Motion for Stay and Abeyance. (Doc. 109 .) The Clerk shall file on the docket Pandeli's Proposed Lodged Motion for Stay and Abeyance. (Doc. 110 .) (See Order for details.) Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 10/12/22. (SST)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER granting Respondent's 9 motion to preclude victim contact as set forth. FURTHER ORDERED granting in part and denying in part Respondents' 10 motion to preclude juror contact as set forth. FURTHER ORDERED denying Respondents' 11 request to impose page limitations. See document for complete details. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 10/4/2017. (ATD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
