Shrader v. USA

Shrader v. USA

Petitioner:	Gregory Lynn Shrader
Respondent:	USA
Case Number:	2:2017cv01708
Filed:	May 30, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Phoenix Division Office
County:	Maricopa
Presiding Judge:	Eileen S Willett (PS)
Presiding Judge:	Neil V Wake
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 9, 2019	Filing 69 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 50 in CV-17-01708-PHX-NVW ) is accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment denying Movant's Amended Motion to Vacate, Se t Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( Doc. 209 in CR-14-00355-PHX-NVW) The Clerk shall terminate the civil action opened in connection with this Motion (CV-17-01708- PHX-NVW). A certificate of appealability will b e denied because (i) the dismissal of Grounds One through Four and Six through Eight are justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable and (ii) Movant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right with respect to the claims presented in Grounds Five. See document for complete details. Signed by Senior Judge Neil V Wake on 9/9/19. (MSA)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 9, 2019

Filing 69 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 50 in CV-17-01708-PHX-NVW ) is accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment denying Movant's Amended Motion to Vacate, Se t Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( Doc. 209 in CR-14-00355-PHX-NVW) The Clerk shall terminate the civil action opened in connection with this Motion (CV-17-01708- PHX-NVW). A certificate of appealability will b e denied because (i) the dismissal of Grounds One through Four and Six through Eight are justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable and (ii) Movant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right with respect to the claims presented in Grounds Five. See document for complete details. Signed by Senior Judge Neil V Wake on 9/9/19. (MSA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shrader v. USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By:	Joan G Ruffennach(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Represented By:	Paul V Stearns(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Represented By:	Raymond K Woo(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Gregory Lynn Shrader
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?