Gunderson v. Corizon et al
Jeremy Lawrence Gunderson |
Corizon, Maureen Johnson and Unknown Salyer |
2:2017cv01791 |
June 8, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Pinal |
Eileen S Willett (PS) |
Diane J Humetewa |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 ORDER granting the Plaintiff's Motion 38 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants mail to Plaintiff at his new address noted in the "Motion for Change of Address" 37 copies of the following: Documents 12 , 18 , 19 , 22 , 23 , [2 4], 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 33 , 34 , and 36 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court send to Plaintiff at his current address copies of the following: Documents 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 13 , 14 , 15 , [16 ], 17 , 20 , 21 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 32 , and 35 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED extending the time for Plaintiff to file a Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment to July 12, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 6/13/2019. (REK) |
Filing 32 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED denying as moot in part and granting in part Defendants' Rule 60 Motion for Relief from This Court's December 6, 2018 Order (Doc. 29 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants have until January 11, 2019 to file their dispositive motion [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 1/2/19. (MAW) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.