Zainulabadin #273511 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
| Pardis Zainulabadin |
| Arizona Department of Corrections, Unknown Party, J Kent, GEO Group Incorporated and J Riddell |
| 2:2017cv01987 |
| June 22, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pinal |
| Deborah M Fine (PS) |
| James A Teilborg |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
104
ORDER: The reference to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn as to Defendants Kent and Ryan's Motion for Summary Judgment 82 ; GEO Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 84 ; and Defendants' Motion to Strike 95 . Defendants' Moti on to Strike 95 is granted, and the Clerk of Court must strike Plaintiff's untimely Amended Response 93 and Statement of Facts 94 from the record. Defendants Kent and Ryan's Motion for Summary Judgment 82 is granted and Count Two of the First Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. GEO Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 84 is granted and Count One of the First Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust the available administrative remedies. There being no claims remaining, the Clerk of Court must terminate the action and enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 8/15/2019. (REK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
