Cottman et al v. Naskrent et al
| Robert P Cottman, Michael A Baker and Daniel L Theobald |
| David G Naskrent, Matthew J Surma, Corrina Surma, Cory Lee Hughes, Corey B Cleghorn, DPHC Enterprise Incorporated, DHSC Enterprise Incorporated and Unknown Parties |
| 2:2017cv02045 |
| June 26, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| John J Tuchi |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that by January 14, 2019, Counsel must mail this Order and the new Case Management Order (forthcoming) to all Defendants and file a certificate in which Counsel certifies that the Orders have been sent. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED t hat upon receipt of a new certificate by Counsel complying with this Order, the Motion for Leave to Withdraw As Attorney for Defendants Without Client Consent (Doc. 70 ), filed by movants Jeffrey H. Wolf and J. Alexander Dattilo of Quarles & Brady LLP, attorneys of record for Defendants David G. Naskrent, Matthew J. and Corrina Surma, Cory Lee Hughes, Corey B. Cleghorn, DPHC Enterprise Inc., and DHSC Enterprise Inc. will be GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon receipt of a new certifica te by Counsel complying with this Order, Jeffrey H. Wolf and J. Alexander Dattilo of Quarles & Brady LLP will be withdrawn as counsel of record for Defendants, and the Clerk shall remove Quarles & Brady LLP and attorneys Jeffrey H. Wolf and J. Alexander Dattilo from ECF noticing in this matter [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 1/2/19. (MAW)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Late the Revised Consent Form and Opt-In Notice (Doc. 63 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court approves the contents of the revised proposed Consent and Noti ce attached as Exhibits 1 and 2 of Plaintiffs' Motion, except that the Notice should be amended to reflect that the action is now pending before Judge Dominic W. Lanza and to remove the judicial signature line. This approval constitutes final authorization of the revised proposed Consent and Notice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, notwithstanding that the Court has already approved the revised proposed Consent and Notice, Plaintiffs shall file the revised proposed Consent and Notice by Dece mber 4, 2018. (Please make sure to calendar this deadline correctly this time.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall mail the Consent and Notice to potential plaintiffs by December 4, 2018 [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 11/30/18. (MAW)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED granting in part and denying in part Plaintiffs' Motion to Proceed Conditionally as a Collective and Class Action (Doc. 26 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED conditionally certifying a collective action, pursuant to 29 U. S.C. 216(b), of all delivery drivers employed by Rosatis on or after May 24, 2014. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Plaintiff's request to certify a class pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall submit a revised proposed Notice and Consent form to the Court no later than October 5, 2018. The final Notice to potential plaintiffs and consent to become party plaintiff should be mailed no later than 14 days after the Court issues final authori zation of the Proposed Notice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall provide Plaintiffs with the names and addresses of all delivery drivers who worked at Rosati's on or after May 24, 2014 no later than September 28, 2018. (See document for full details). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 9/11/18. (LAD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
