Caballero v. Healthtech Resources Incorporated
| Jessica Caballero |
| Healthtech Resources Incorporated |
| 2:2017cv02321 |
| July 14, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Steven P Logan |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
ORDER: The parties' Joint Motion to Approve Settlement Agreement and Award of Attorneys' Fees and Costs 77 is granted. The Court approves the parties' Settlement Agreement (Doc. 77 , Ex. 1), including the approval of the cy pres rec ipient, Community Legal Services. The request by Plaintiff's attorney for its fees and for reimbursement of costs and expenses in the amount of $55,000 pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), is approved. The request of a $2500 service award to Plaintiff Caballero is approved. This action is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall terminate this case accordingly. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 10/15/2018. (REK)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER that Plaintiff's Motion for Conditional Collective Action Certification and Court-Supervised Notice 55 is granted in part anddenied in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Parties' Joint Motion to Extend Time to Complete In-Person Settlement Conference 65 is granted. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 2/20/18. (CLB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
