E*Trade Financial Corporation v. Eaton

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Arizona District Court E*Trade Financial Corporation v. Eaton

E*Trade Financial Corporation v. Eaton

Plaintiff:	E*Trade Financial Corporation
Defendant:	Lance Eaton
Case Number:	2:2017cv02471
Filed:	July 25, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Phoenix Division Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	John J Tuchi
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 10, 2019	Filing 103 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED denying Defendant's Motion to Vacate Preliminary Injunction Order (Doc. 95 ). This matter remains closed. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 12/9/19. (JAMA) Modified on 12/10/2019 to add WO (JAMA).
April 24, 2018	Filing 87 ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction 52 is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED: 1) Prohibiting Eaton from further using ETrade's confidential information, as defined in the Agreement, regarding any account of a person who was a client of Eaton's at ETrade who has not transferred their accounts to Morgan Stanley or was not in the process of doing so as of the date of this Order. 2) Prohibiting Eaton from further soliciting ETrade clients through July 7, 2018. 3) Req uiring Eaton to return immediately all ETrade confidential information susceptible of physical transfer, and to delete immediately any such information not susceptible to physical transfer, such as client contact information for current or former E* Trade clients contained on a cellular telephone, that does not pertain to clients who have moved to Morgan Stanley or were in the process of so moving as of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Defendant's Motion for Preliminary Injunction 58 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate this matter. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 4/24/2018. (REK)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 10, 2019

Filing 103 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED denying Defendant's Motion to Vacate Preliminary Injunction Order (Doc. 95 ). This matter remains closed. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 12/9/19. (JAMA) Modified on 12/10/2019 to add WO (JAMA).

April 24, 2018

Filing 87 ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction 52 is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED: 1) Prohibiting Eaton from further using E*Trade's confidential information, as defined in the Agreement, regarding any account of a person who was a client of Eaton's at E*Trade who has not transferred their accounts to Morgan Stanley or was not in the process of doing so as of the date of this Order. 2) Prohibiting Eaton from further soliciting E*Trade clients through July 7, 2018. 3) Req uiring Eaton to return immediately all E*Trade confidential information susceptible of physical transfer, and to delete immediately any such information not susceptible to physical transfer, such as client contact information for current or former E* Trade clients contained on a cellular telephone, that does not pertain to clients who have moved to Morgan Stanley or were in the process of so moving as of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Defendant's Motion for Preliminary Injunction 58 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate this matter. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 4/24/2018. (REK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: E*Trade Financial Corporation v. Eaton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: E*Trade Financial Corporation
Represented By:	Rhianna S Sharon Hughes
Represented By:	Rodney Brandon Sorensen
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Lance Eaton
Represented By:	Matthew B. Henneman
Represented By:	Rodolfo Parga, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?