Tibbetts v. Ryan et al
Jason Earl Tibbetts |
Charles Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
2:2017cv02499 |
July 26, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Pinal |
David K Duncan (PS) |
Roslyn O Silver |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 ORDER denying 25 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 3/11/20. (CLB) |
Filing 23 ORDER ADOPTING 14 Report and Recommendation to the extent it is consistent with the analysis listed in this Order and REJECTED to the extent it is inconsistent. ORDERED Tibbetts' Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ) is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Respondents. FURTHER ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are DENIED because the petition does not make a substantial showing of the denial of the constitutional right. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 9/5/19. (EJA) |
Filing 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) be denied and dismissed with prejudice and that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal be denied because dismissal of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the ruling debatable. Signed by Magistrate Judge David K Duncan on 3/12/18. (DXD) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.