MD Helicopters Incorporated v. Boeing Company
Plaintiff: MD Helicopters Incorporated
Defendant: Boeing Company
Case Number: 2:2017cv02598
Filed: August 3, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: James A Teilborg
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 153 ORDER granting Boeing's 123 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part MDHI's 146 Motion for Summary Judgment. See attached order for details. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 8/15/19. (CLB)
May 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 145 ORDER denying as moot 139 Motion to Seal. The Clerk of the Court is directed to leave the documents at Doc. 140 lodged and under seal. The Court will not consider the documents lodged at Doc. 140 in the resolution of this case, and will inst ead consider the versions of Exhibits C, T, Y, and Z filed at Doc. 1[44-3]. FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot 129 Joint Motion for Leave to File Under Seal. The Clerk of the Court is directed to leave the documents at Docs. 131 and 132 lod ged and under seal. The Court will not consider the documents lodged at Doc. 131 and 132 in the resolution of this case. Instead, the Court will consider the versions of Exhibits 35, 40, 41, 42, 45, 47, 50, 52, 53, 60, 64, 70, 71, and 74 fil ed at Docs. [144-1] and [144-2], and the versions of Exhibits 33 and 57 filed at Docs. [127-8], [127-9], and [128-2]. FURTHER ORDERED that MDHI shall refile public versions of its Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 126 ) and Statement of Facts (Doc. 127 ) which only redact information set forth in the redacted portions of Exhibits 33, 35, 41, 42, 50, 57, 60, 70, and 71 by May 29, 2019. FINALLY ORDERED striking 126 MDHI's Motion for Summary Judgment and Statement of Facts (Doc. 127 ). If filed by May 29, 2019, MDHI's updated versions of its Motion for Summary Judgment and Statement of Facts will be deemed timely. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 5/20/19. (MAP)
April 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 143 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that by 5/10/2019, Boeing shall file a memorandum in support of its Motion to Seal Documents (Doc. 139 ) which specifies with particularity the compelling reasons why Exhibits C, T, Y, and Z to Boeing's Controverting Statement of Facts should be sealed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that MDHI may respond to Boeing's memorandum, if it so chooses, within the time provided by LRCiv 7.2(c). Boeing will not be permitted to file any reply. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that by < b>5/10/2019, the parties shall jointly file a memorandum in support of their Joint Application For Leave to File Under Seal Certain Documents Related to MDHI's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 129 ). IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the parties explain in their joint memorandum whether they still wish to file Exhibit 57 under seal. [See attached Order for complete details.] Signed by Senior Judge James A. Teilborg on 4/26/2019. (RMW)
January 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 121 ORDER that the request to extend discovery (part of Doc. 120 ) is denied; the request for issuance of letters rogatory (part of Doc. 120 ) is denied as moot. (See attached order for further information.) Signed by Senior Judge James A. Teilborg on 1/29/2019. (RMW)
April 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff MD Helicopters Incorporated's Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. 21 ), is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part in accordance with this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Counterclaims 1 and 2 are dismiss ed without prejudice so the parties may resolve the claims in accordance with their contractual alternative dispute resolution procedures. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Counterclaim 4 is dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Counterclaims 3, 6, 7, 8 and 9 are not dismissed in accordance with this Order [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 4/23/18. (MAW)
April 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that MDHI's notice of intent to provide live testimony at the hearing on its motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, (Doc. 43 ), is DENIED [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 4/9/18. (MAW)
October 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to withdraw and delete pleadings, or alternatively, to seal (Doc. 12 ) is granted to the limited extent that the Clerk of the Court shall seal Doc. 1 [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 10/12/17.(MAW)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MD Helicopters Incorporated v. Boeing Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MD Helicopters Incorporated
Represented By: James H Marburger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boeing Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?