Chatman v. Ferrell et al
| Montiah Chatman |
| Marci D Ferrell, Cindy Chrisman and Arizona, State of |
| 2:2017cv03826 |
| October 18, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
188
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' Rule 50 Motion for directed verdict. Defendants' Rule 50 motion is GRANTED as to Mr. Sullivan and Ms. Ferrell and DENIED as to Ms. Chrisman. (See attached Order for details.) Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 3/9/2021. (MMO)
|
|
Filing
153
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 147 Motion for Summary Judgment as detailed herein. FURTHER ORDERED that summary judgment is granted to Defendants on Plaintiffs' negligence claim insofar as it rests on alleged violations of A.R.S. §§ 8-821(F) and 8-823. See document for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 12/23/2020. (RMV)
|
|
Filing
129
ORDER granting Plaintiffs' 110 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; and denying Defendants' 128 Cross Motion for Summary Judgment. Telephonic trial scheduling conference is set for 3/5/2020 at 9:30 AM. (See Order for details.) Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 2/13/2020. (MMO)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER denying 21 Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 6/29/2018. (MMO)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
