Espinoza v. Ryan et al
| Adrien Joshua Espinoza |
| Charles L Ryan, S Mangan, T Williams, Unknown Sieger, Unknown Quintero, Unknown Ramos, G Osler, D McClincy, J Lyons, Ruben Montano, Kevin Curran, Unknown Parties, Unknown Curtis, Unknown Jaeger, Unknown Franco, Unknown Knight and Rodrick Williams |
| 2:2017cv03983 |
| October 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pinal |
| James F Metcalf (PS) |
| Roslyn O Silver |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
202
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 192 ) is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Defendants' Motion for Sanctions (Doc. 181 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED as a sanction under Rule 37(b)(2)(A), Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 9 ) and this action are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (See document for further details). Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 8/14/2020. (LAD)
|
|
Filing
188
ORDER denying 178 Motion for Change of Judge; denying 179 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 11/26/19. (CLB)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 61 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Defendants' 47 Motion to Set Aside Default is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Defendants' lodged Joinder to the Answer at Doc. 48 must be filed. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 4/12/19. (GMP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
