Wallace v. Riggs et al
Plaintiff: Martice Deshawn Wallace
Defendant: Todd Riggs and Daniel Warren
Case Number: 2:2017cv04126
Filed: November 8, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: John Z Boyle (PS)
Presiding Judge: Diane J Humetewa
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 294 ORDER that Plaintiff's Motion for New Trial (Doc. 284 ) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Status Update (Doc. 293 ) is granted. See document for complete details. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 8/29/2022. (WLP)
January 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 247 *ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Issuance of Subpoenas (Doc. 243 ) is granted in part and denied in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the U.S. Marshalls Service shall attempt to serve the following individuals with the corresponding subpoenas attached to Plaintiff's Motion (Doc. 243 ). - Timothy Jones: 200 W. Washington St., Suite 1300, Phoenix, AZ 85003,- Scott Alfred: 200 W. Washington St., Suite 1300, Phoenix, AZ 85003,- Keith Wagner: 200 W. Washington S t., Suite 1300, Phoenix, AZ 85003,- Todd Riggs: 200 W. Washington St., Suite 1300, Phoenix, AZ 85003, - Daniel Warren: 200 W. Washington St., Suite 1300, Phoenix, AZ 85003, or, alternatively, 120 S. 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034, - Michael Ong: 200 W. Washington St., Suite 1300, Phoenix, AZ 85003 or, alternatively, 120 S. 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034, - Nick Calandra: 200 W. Washington St., Suite 1300, Phoenix, AZ 85003 or, alternatively, 1717 E. Grant St., Suite 100, Phoenix, AZ 85034, - T ara Ridgeway: 1601 W. Jefferson, Phoenix, AZ 85007. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Plaintiff's remaining requests are denied, as stated herein. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 1/25/2022. (LAD) *Modified to add text on 1/26/2022 (LAD).
July 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 197 ORDER: The Court issues its ruling on the following pending motions as set for forth in this Order. IT IS ORDERED granting Plaintiff's "Motion in Limine #2 Seeking Designation of Named Defendants as Adverse Witnesses" (Doc. 179 ) ; granting in part and denying in part the Motion in Limine to Exclude All Evidence Regarding Criminal History and Sentence (Doc. 178 ); denying the Motion in Limine #3 (Doc. 182 ); denying the Motion in Limine #4 (Doc. 183 ). Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 7/28/2021. (See Order for details.) (LFIG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wallace v. Riggs et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Martice Deshawn Wallace
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Todd Riggs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Warren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?