AmSurg Holdings Incorporated et al v. Anireddy et al
| AmSurg Holdings Incorporated and Yuma AZ Endoscopy ASC LLC |
| Divesh Anireddy, Alec Esker, Seth Miller, Beverly Bryant, Endoscopy Center of Yuma LLC and Yuma Endoscopy Center LLC |
| 2:2017cv04181 |
| November 14, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Diane J Humetewa |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
230
AMENDED ORDER granting 177 , 195 Non-Party AmSurg LLC Motions to Modify Subpoenas Directed to Bank of America. FURTHER ORDERED granting 175 Non-Party AmSurg LLC's Motion to File Exhibit Under Seal. The Clerk of Court is directed to file Exhibit C of Doc. 177 under seal. Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 4/7/20. (MAP)
|
|
Filing
225
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED GRANTING Non-Party AmSurg LLC Motions to Modify Subpoenas Directed to Bank of America. (Doc. 177 ; Doc. 195 .) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED GRANTING Non-Party AmSurg LLCs Motion to File Exhibit Under Seal, (Doc. 175 ). The Clerk of Court is directed to file Exhibit C of Doc. 177 under seal. (See document for complete details). Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 1/14/20. (SLQ)
|
|
Filing
133
ORDER denying 62 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 1/29/2019. (TCA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
