Harmon et al v. Hays et al
Apex Medical Staffing LLC and Thomas Harmon |
Springboard Incorporated, Gavin Hays, Unknown Hays and Unknown Parties |
Amanda Hanson, Stefani Fox and Phoenix Medical Staffing |
2:2017cv04493 |
December 4, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Maricopa |
John J Tuchi |
Other Statutes: Securities/Commodities |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Petition for Removal: SEC Act |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 ORDER -The above-entitled matter is hereby dismissed with prejudice, the parties to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees and directing the Clerk to close this matter. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 03/13/2018. (KAS) |
Filing 28 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that this matter will be dismissed with prejudice 30 days after the docketing of this order unless the parties file a stipulation to dismiss prior to that date. The settlement constitutes an accord which has extinguished the underlying claim. All pending hearings and motions are deemed moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED vacating the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for February 12, 2018 at 2:00 p.m. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 2/1/18. (JAMA) |
Filing 27 *NOTICE of Settlement and MOTION to Vacate re:Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for February 12 by Thomas Harmon. (Goodman, Christopher) *Modified to add Motion part on 2/1/2018 (KAS). |
Filing 26 ORDER - Fox and Hanson are to file a Motion to Vacate Default no later than February 9, 2018, stating why their answers were filed late. Defendant/Counterclaimants Gavin Hays and Springboard Incorporated shall file any response by 10:00 a.m. on February 12, 2018. The Clerk shall mail a copy of the Court's December 29, 2017 Amended Order (Doc. #12 ) to Fox and Hanson. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all parties must be present for the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for February 12, 2018, at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 505, 401 W. Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge John J. Tuchi. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 01/31/2018. (KAS) |
Filing 25 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that counsel for the Plaintiffs apply for entry of default or file a status report within seven days of the date of this Order concerning the status of this case as to Defendant Phoenix Medical Staffing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the matter will be dismissed without further notice as to Defendant Phoenix Medical Staffing if counsel fails to apply for entry of default or file a status report within seven days of the date of this Order. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 1/30/18. (JAMA) |
Filing 24 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (SLQ) |
Filing 23 ANSWER to #6 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by Amanda Hanson.(SLQ) |
Filing 22 ANSWER to #6 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by Stefani Fox.(SLQ) |
Filing 21 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Amanda Hanson - Pursuant to Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and upon application by the Defendant, default is hereby entered against Counter-DefendantAmanda Hanson. (KAS) |
Filing 20 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Stefani Fox - Pursuant to Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and upon application by the Defendant, default is hereby entered against Counter-Defendant Stefani Fox. (KAS) |
Filing 19 *APPLICATION for Entry of Default as to Amanda Hanson by Gavin Hays, Springboard Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Michelle G. Breit)(Breit, Michelle) *Modified to correct event type on 1/30/2018 (KAS). |
Filing 18 *APPLICATION for Entry of Default as to Stefani Fox by Gavin Hays, Springboard Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Michelle G. Breit)(Breit, Michelle) *Modified to correct event type on 1/30/2018 (KAS). |
Filing 17 *SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Gavin Hays, Springboard Incorporated: Certificate of Service re: Summons, Answer to Complaint and CounterClaim; Notice re MID Pilot Project and Order Served upon Austin c/o Stefanie Fox on 01/02/18. (Breit, Michelle) Modified to correct service date on 1/25/2018 (KAS). |
Filing 16 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Gavin Hays, Springboard Incorporated: Certificate of Service re: Summons, Answer to Complaint and CounterClaim; Notice re MID Pilot Project and Order Served upon Amanda Hanson on 12/29/17. (Breit, Michelle) Modified docket text on 1/25/2018 (KAS). |
Filing 15 ORDER granting the Joint Stipulation (Doc. #14 ). The Parties have until February 8, 2018, to provide Mandatory Initial Discovery Responses. No further extensions will be granted. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 01/19/2018. (KAS) |
Filing 14 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time for Parties to Serve Mandatory Initial Discovery Responses by Gavin Hays, Springboard Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Breit, Michelle) |
Filing 13 *SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Gavin Hays, Springboard Incorporated: Acceptance of Service by Christopher Goodman on behalf of Phoenix Medical Staffing, dated 12/22/17 . (Breit, Michelle) *Modified language on 1/2/2018 (SLQ). |
Filing 12 AMENDED ORDER: Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 2/12/2018 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 505, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge John J Tuchi. All parties are directed to meet at least 21 days before the Pretrial Scheduling Conference, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f). (See Order for details.) Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 12/22/2017. (MMO) |
Filing 11 **AMENDED by Doc. #12 ** ORDER: Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 2/12/2018 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 505, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge John J Tuchi. All parties are directed to meet at least 21 days before the Pretrial Scheduling Conference, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f). (See Order for details.) Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 12/22/2017. (MMO) Modified on 12/29/2017 (MMO). |
Filing 10 *PLAINTIFF'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by Apex Medical Staffing LLC, Thomas Harmon. (Goodman, Christopher) *Modified to correct event/add filer on 12/27/2017 (DXD). |
Filing 9 *Corporate Disclosure Statement by Apex Medical Staffing LLC. (Goodman, Christopher) *Modified to correct event on 12/27/2017 (DXD). |
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Stefani Fox, Amanda Hanson, Phoenix Medical Staffing. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(BAS). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Submitted by Springboard Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(Breit, Michelle) |
Filing 6 Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand AND, COUNTERCLAIM against Thomas Harmon, Amanda Hanson, Stefani Fox, Phoenix Medical Staffing by Springboard Incorporated, Gavin Hays. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Breit, Michelle) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Apex Medical Staffing LLC. (DXD) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (DXD) |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-14926423. This case has been assigned to the Honorable John J Tuchi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-17-04493-PHX-JJT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (DXD) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Springboard Incorporated (submitted by Michelle Breit). (DXD) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2017-014286. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-14926423 filed by Springboard Incorporated, Gavin Hays (submitted by Michelle Breit). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A State Court Docs, #2 Exhibit B State Court Docs, #3 Exhibit C State Court Docs, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Supplemental) (DXD) |
***State Court record received on 12/4/17*** SERVICE EXECUTED : Declaration of Service re: Summons/Complaint/Certificate of Arbitration upon Gavin Hays and Springboard Incorporated on 11/6/17. ***Filed in State Court on 11/16/17 and docketed in US District Court on 12/4/17 for case management purposes.*** (DXD) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.