Oliver v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Arizona District Court Oliver v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company

Oliver v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company

Plaintiff:	Adam E Oliver
Defendant:	Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company
Case Number:	2:2018cv00038
Filed:	January 5, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Phoenix Division Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	John J Tuchi
Nature of Suit:	Insurance
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 29, 2019	Filing 135 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that to the extent that Plaintiff Adam Oliver's "Notice of Lodging Controverting Statement of Fact and Exhibits under Seal in Support of Response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment" (Doc. 133 ), whi ch is docketed as a motion, is intended to be a motion to seal, it is denied without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Notice will satisfy Plaintiff's obligation under LRCiv 5.6(d) once Plaintiff's Statement of Controverting Facts Nos. 133 and 134, and Exhibits CC and DD are lodged. If Plaintiff lodges these documents, Defendant will have 14 days after the date on which the documents are lodged to file either (1) a notice withdrawing the confidentiality designation on these documents or (2) a motion to seal them [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 5/29/19. (MAW)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 29, 2019

Filing 135 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that to the extent that Plaintiff Adam Oliver's "Notice of Lodging Controverting Statement of Fact and Exhibits under Seal in Support of Response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment" (Doc. 133 ), whi ch is docketed as a motion, is intended to be a motion to seal, it is denied without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Notice will satisfy Plaintiff's obligation under LRCiv 5.6(d) once Plaintiff's Statement of Controverting Facts Nos. 133 and 134, and Exhibits CC and DD are lodged. If Plaintiff lodges these documents, Defendant will have 14 days after the date on which the documents are lodged to file either (1) a notice withdrawing the confidentiality designation on these documents or (2) a motion to seal them [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 5/29/19. (MAW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Oliver v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adam E Oliver
Represented By:	Robert J Hommel
Represented By:	Orien Praiser Nelson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company
Represented By:	Ann-Martha Andrews
Represented By:	Kristina Novotny Holmstrom
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?