Unknown Party et al v. Motel 6 Operating LP et al
Plaintiff: Unknown Party
Defendant: Unknown Parties, Motel 6 Operating LP and G6 Hospitality LLC
Case Number: 2:2018cv00242
Filed: January 23, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: David G Campbell
Referring Judge: Deborah M Fine
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2018 Remark: Pro hac vice motion granted for Peter J Kadzik on behalf of defendants. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
November 7, 2018 Remark: Pro hac vice motions granted for Michael DeSanctis, Christopher M Lynch and Donald Verrilli Jr on behalf of defendants. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
November 5, 2018 Filing 35 *Joint NOTICE of Request for Oral Argument by Motel 6 Operating LP, G6 Hospitality LLC . (Refo, Patricia) *Modified text and to add filer on 11/6/2018 (ATD).
November 2, 2018 Filing 34 *NOTICE of Errata re: #33 Joint MOTION to Certify Class, Joint MOTION (1) Granting Preliminary Approval of the Class Action Settlement; (2) Conditionally Certifying Settlement Class; (3) Appointing Class Representatives and Class Counsel; (4) Approving Notice Plan; and (5) Setting Final Approval Hearing Corrected Proposed Order by Plaintiffs Unknown Party, Unknown Party, Unknown Party, Unknown Party, Unknown Party, Unknown Party, Unknown Party, Unknown Party. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Correct Proposed Order)(Holguin-Flores, Andres) *Modified text on 11/5/2018 (ATD).
November 2, 2018 Filing 33 *Joint MOTION to Certify Class, Joint MOTION ( 1) Granting Preliminary Approval of the Class Action Settlement; (2) Conditionally Certifying Settlement Class; (3) Appointing Class Representatives and Class Counsel; (4) Approving Notice Plan; and (5) Setting Final Approval Hearing by Unknown Party (named as John M.), Unknown Party (named as John A.), Unknown Party (named as Jane F.), Unknown Party (named as Jane N.), Unknown Party (named as John E.), Unknown Party (named as Jane V.), Unknown Party (named as John W.), Unknown Party (named as John D.). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Settlement Agreement, #2 Declaration of Andres Holguin-Flores, #3 Exhibit Proposed Claim Form, #4 Exhibit Proposed Postcard Notice, #5 Exhibit Proposed Website Notice, #6 Exhibit Proposed Social Media Notice, #7 Text of Proposed Order)(Holguin-Flores, Andres) *Modified text on 11/5/2018 (ATD).
October 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the consent joint motion for extension (Doc. #31 ) is granted. The parties shall file a joint motion seeking preliminary approval of the class settlement and any related filings no later than November 2, 2018. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 10/9/18. (SLQ)
October 4, 2018 Filing 31 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time To File Joint Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class-wide Settlement by Unknown Party(named as John M.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as John A.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as Jane F.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as Jane N.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as John E.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as Jane V.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as John W.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as John D.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order [Proposed] Order)(Holguin-Flores, Andres)
August 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER granting #29 Motion for Scheduling Order. The Courts #28 Order is vacated. The Parties shall file a joint motion seeking preliminary approval of the class settlement and any related filings no later than October 5, 2018. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 8/20/18. (MSA)
August 16, 2018 Filing 29 Joint MOTION Entry of Scheduling Order and Relief from Deadlines in July 6, 2018 Order re: #28 Order, Terminate Deadlines and Hearings, Terminate Motions, Set Deadlines by Unknown Party(named as John M.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as John A.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as Jane F.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as Jane N.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as John E.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as Jane V.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as John W.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as John D.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order [Proposed])(Holguin-Flores, Andres)
July 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ***VACATED BY #30 ORDER*** ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: 1. This matter will, without further Order of this Court, be dismissed with prejudice on August 31, 2018 unless a stipulation to dismiss is filed prior to the dismissal date. 2. All pending hearings and deadlines are vacated. 3. All pending motions are found to be moot. 4. The Clerk is directed to terminate this matter on August 31, 2018 without further leave of Court if a stipulation to dismiss is not filed prior to this date. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 7/6/18. (SLQ) Modified on 8/20/2018 (MSA).
July 6, 2018 Filing 27 NOTICE of Attorney Withdrawal Andres Gallegos filed by Andres J Gallegos. (Gallegos, Andres)
July 6, 2018 Filing 26 NOTICE of Settlement Joint Notice of Settlement and Joint Motion for Relief From All Pending Deadlines by G6 Hospitality LLC, Motel 6 Operating LP. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Refo, Patricia)
May 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER - All parties have indicated that they have a good faith belief that this case will be resolved within 30 days. Therefore, the time to submit MID responses is extended for 30 days. Absolutely no further extensions will be granted. The Rule 16 Case Management Conference set for 6/15/2018 at 3:30 PM is VACATED and RESET for 7/26/2018 at 04:30 PM in Courtroom 603, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge David G Campbell. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 5/29/2018. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DGC, nvo)
May 25, 2018 Filing 24 MOTION to Continue Defer Scheduling Conference by G6 Hospitality LLC, Motel 6 Operating LP, Unknown Parties. (Refo, Patricia)
May 8, 2018 Filing 23 ANSWER to Complaint by G6 Hospitality LLC, Motel 6 Operating LP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Refo, Patricia)
April 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER granting a one-time extension of time until 5/8/2018 for Defendants Motel 6 Operating, LP and G6 Hospitality LLC to respond to complaint. The parties' obligations to produce the information called for in the MIDP will be triggered by Defendant's answer to the complaint after the extension. The parties should be aware that the filing of a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) will not postpone the time for compliance with the MIDP. General Order 17-08 provides that compliance may be deferred only for motions to dismiss based on lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, lack of personal jurisdiction, sovereign immunity, or absolute or qualified immunity of a public official. No further extensions will be granted. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 4/11/2018. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DGC, nvo)
April 11, 2018 Filing 21 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT by G6 Hospitality LLC, Motel 6 Operating LP. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Refo, Patricia)
April 6, 2018 Filing 20 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Unknown Party(named as John M.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated): Proof of Service re: Summons & Complaint upon Motel 6 Operating LP on 03/27/2018. (Ortega, Daniel)
April 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER re: 18 Minute Order, Add and Terminate Judges, Set/Reset Hearings. The Rule 16 Case Management Conference set before The Honorable Charles Pyle for 6/11/2018 at 2:30 PM is VACATED and RESET for 6/15/2018 at 03:30 PM in Courtroom 603, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge David G Campbell. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 4/4/2018. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DGC, nvo)
March 27, 2018 Filing 18 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. FURTHER ORDERED Case reassigned by random draw to Judge David G. Campbell. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-18-242-PHX-DGC. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference set before Judge Charles R. Pyle on 6/11/18 at 2:30 PM is now RESET before Judge David G. Campbell, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
March 26, 2018 Filing 17 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
March 26, 2018 Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Patricia Lee Refo on behalf of G6 Hospitality LLC, Motel 6 Operating LP. (Refo, Patricia)
March 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER SETTING RULE 16 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE - Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a telephonic Case Management Conference is set for Monday, June 11, 2018 at 2:30 pm. The Court has set aside one hour for the telephonic conference. (See document for complete details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles R Pyle on 3/26/18. (SLQ)
March 16, 2018 Filing 13 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Unknown Party(named as John M.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as John A.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as Jane F.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as Jane N.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as John E.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as Jane V.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as John W.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as John D.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated): Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on 3/8/2018 to G6 Hospitality, LLC . (Gallegos, Andres)
March 6, 2018 Filing 12 Summons Issued as to G6 Hospitality LLC, Motel 6 Operating LP. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(BAS). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
March 6, 2018 Filing 11 SUMMONS Submitted by Unknown Party(named as John M.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as John A.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as Jane F.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as Jane N.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as John E.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as Jane V.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as John W.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as John D.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated). (Gallegos, Andres)
March 6, 2018 Filing 10 SUMMONS Submitted by Unknown Party(named as John M.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as John A.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as Jane F.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as Jane N.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as John E.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as Jane V.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as John W.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as John D.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated). (Gallegos, Andres)
March 5, 2018 Filing 9 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #8 Summons Submitted filed by Unknown Party. Summons completed incorrectly. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please refile corrected summonses listing only one Defendant per summons using the Service of Process / Summons Submitted category. As soon as the Court receives the corrected summons, they will be issued on the following business day. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DXD)
March 5, 2018 Remark: Pro hac vice motion granted for Thomas Saenz on behalf of plaintiffs. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
February 14, 2018 Filing 8 SUMMONS Submitted by Unknown Party(named as John M.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as John A.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as Jane F.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as Jane N.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as John E.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as Jane V.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as John W.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party(named as John D.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated). (Gallegos, Andres)
February 13, 2018 Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER: That counsel having complied with this Court's Order, the Order to Show Cause Hearing scheduled for March 12, 2018 is hereby VACATED. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
February 12, 2018 Filing 6 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
February 12, 2018 Remark: Pro hac vice motions granted for Andres R Holguin-Flores and Andres J Gallegos on behalf of plaintiffs. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
February 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Ordered that Jane V., John A., John E., Jane F., John D., John M., Jane N., and John W. show cause for failure to comply with LRCiv 3.7(b) before Judge G Murray Snow. Show Cause Hearing set for 3/12/2018 at 04:30 PM before Judge G Murray Snow. (Attachments: #1 Instructions, #2 Consetn Form)(MAP)
January 24, 2018 Remark: Pro hac vice motion granted for Nina Perales on behalf of plaintiffs. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
January 23, 2018 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-15085270. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Deborah M Fine. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-18-00242-PHX-DMF. Magistrate Election form attached. (Attachments: #1 Instructions) (LAD)
January 23, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (LAD)
January 23, 2018 Filing 1 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-15085270 filed by Unknown Party (named as John M.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party (named as John A.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party (named as Jane F.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party (named as Jane N.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party (named as John E.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party (named as Jane V.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party (named as John W.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated), Unknown Party (named as John D.; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated). (Submitted by Nina Perales) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(LAD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Unknown Party et al v. Motel 6 Operating LP et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Unknown Party
Represented By: Andres R Holguin-Flores
Represented By: Nina Perales
Represented By: Andres J Gallegos
Represented By: Thomas A Saenz
Represented By: Daniel R Ortega, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Motel 6 Operating LP
Represented By: Michael Brian DeSanctis
Represented By: Donald B Verrilli, Jr.
Represented By: Christopher M Lynch
Represented By: Peter Joseph Kadzik
Represented By: Donald Wayne Bivens
Represented By: Patricia Lee Refo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: G6 Hospitality LLC
Represented By: Michael Brian DeSanctis
Represented By: Donald B Verrilli, Jr.
Represented By: Christopher M Lynch
Represented By: Peter Joseph Kadzik
Represented By: Donald Wayne Bivens
Represented By: Patricia Lee Refo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?