Meza et al v. Wacker Neuson Sales Americas LLC et al
| Antonio Meza, Dora Meza, Susana Meza, Monica Kim, Jonathan Meza and Erik Meza |
| Wacker Neuson Sales Americas LLC and Unknown Parties |
| 2:2018cv00574 |
| February 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| H Russel Holland |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
ORDER - Wacker's motion to strike 82 is granted in part and denied in part. The motion is granted as to Dr. Freeman's opinions regarding his own life expectancy analysis. The motion is otherwise denied. (See document for complete details). Signed by Judge H Russel Holland on 6/10/19. (SLQ)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER: Defendant's motion for an independent medical examination pursuant to Rule 35(a)(2), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37 , is granted. The IME proceedings shall not be recorded. Plaintiff's guardian may not be present during the adm inistration of psychological testing. English/Spanish translation shall be provided by Dr. Killian without the participation of plaintiff's guardian. In light of the forgoing rulings, plaintiff's motion for a protective order 39 is moot and is denied. Signed by Judge H Russel Holland on 9/12/2018. (REK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
