Brummer #160622 v. Ryan et al
| Joseph Brummer |
| Charles L Ryan, Unknown Figueroa, A Jacobs, D Stemple, J Mattos and Ron Towles |
| 2:2018cv01146 |
| April 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pinal |
| John Z Boyle (PS) |
| David G Campbell |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER: The reference to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn as to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 42 ), Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 43 ), and Plaintiff's Motion for Status on Motion for Summary Judgme nt (Doc. 50 ). Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 42 ) is denied. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 43 ) is granted and this action is dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's Motion for Status on Motion for S ummary Judgment (Doc. 50 ) is granted to the extent that this Order informs him of the status of this action. The Clerk of Court shall terminate this action and enter judgment. (See Order for further details.) Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 02/21/2020. (SST)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the reference to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn as to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Relief and Order (Doc. 9 ), and the Motion is denied. (See document for complete details). Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 5/1/19. (SLQ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
