Keller v. Smith & Nephew Incorporated et al
Linda Keller |
Corin Group, Stryker Corporation, Stryker Sales Corporation, Deput Products Incorporated, DePuy International Limited, Unknown Parties, Johnson & Johnson Services Incorporated, Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson International, Howmedica Osteonics, Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical Incorporated, Smith & Nephew Incorporated, DePuy Orthopaedics Incorporated, Johnson & Johnson Health Care Systems Incorporated, Johnson & Johnson Medical Limited, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development LLC, Stryker Sales Corporation doing business as Stryker Orthopaedics, Corin Group doing business as Corin USA and Smith & Nephew Incorporated doing business as Smith & Nephew PLC doing business as Smith & Nephew Orthopaedic Division doing business as Smith & Nephew USD Limited |
2:2018cv01235 |
April 23, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Maricopa |
Douglas L Rayes |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Linda Keller. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3): Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (SIB) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Linda Keller. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(c) - Documents shall be converted to PDF directly from a word processing program and per Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual must be text searchable. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (SIB) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (SIB) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(SIB). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-15406195. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Douglas L Rayes. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-18-1235-PHX-DLR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SIB) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Linda Keller. (Massey, Daniel) (Attachments: #1 Summons)(SIB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-15406195 filed by Linda Keller. (Massey, Daniel) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SIB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.