Harmon v. Ryan et al
| Jeffrey Wayne Harmon |
| Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| 2:2018cv01252 |
| April 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Eileen S Willett (PS) |
| John J Tuchi |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER ADOPTING 21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted in full. The 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 USC § 2254 (Doc. 1) is denied. Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 2/27/19.(BAC)
|
|
Filing
21
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge recommends that the District Court enter an order Denying the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Harmon's claim that the state overcharged his crimes is waived by his plea of guilty. Counsel d id not "strong arm" Harmon into accepting the plea agreement. Any party may serve and file written objections within 14 days of being served with a copy of this report and recommendation. If objections are not timely filed, they may be deemed waived. Local Rules permit a response to an objection. They do not permit a reply to a response without the permission of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie A Bowman on 1/28/19. (BAC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
