Brown v. Glendale, City of et al
Plaintiff: Antonio Brown
Defendant: Glendale, City of, Lawrence Gonzalez, Unknown Gonzalez, Rick St John and Unknown Parties
Case Number: 2:2018cv01267
Filed: April 24, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: Douglas L Rayes
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 96 ORDER: The Clerk of Court shall mail the Court's August 22, 2019 order 75 , December 27, 2019 order 85 , January 6, 2020 order 90 , and this order to the Thunderbird Road address. Defendants shall serve their pending motion for summary judgme nt on Plaintiff via mail to the Thunderbird Road address and via email to coachantoniobrown@gmail.com by February 7, 2020. Plaintiff shall file, by February 14, 2020, a notice with the Court (1) confirming receipt of the Court's orders and Defendants' motion for summary judgment and (2) affirmatively identifying his mailing address. If Plaintiff fails to file the notice by February 14, 2020, the Clerk of Court shall dismiss this case with prejudice. The deadline by which Plaintiff must respond to Defendants' motion for summary judgment is extended to March 9, 2020. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 2/06/2020. (REK)
January 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' second motion for leave to file under seal (Doc. 86 ) is granted. The Clerk of Court shall file under seal the lodged unredacted motion for summary judgment (Doc. 87 ) and Exhibit 7 thereto (Doc. 87 -8). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall file in the public record a redacted version of their motion for summary judgment, together with all of the exhibits other than Exhibit 7. (See document for complete details). Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 1/6/20. (SLQ)
December 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED denying without prejudice Defendants' motion for leave to file its summary judgment motion and exhibits thereto under seal (Doc. 80 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to LRCiv 5.6(e), the lodged documents will not be filed, but will remain under seal. The Court will extend the time provided by LRCiv 5.6(e) for Defendants to act. Defendants may, within 15 days of the entry of this Order, (1) resubmit the motion and its exhibits for filing in the public record, or (2) file a new motion to seal that conforms with the requirements delineated in this order. (See document for complete details). Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 12/26/19. (SLQ)
August 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER that the Fowler Firm's motion to withdraw as counsel of record with client consent 68 is granted. The Wilenchik Firm's motion to withdraw as counsel of record without client consent 67 is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mail a copy of this Order to Antonio Brown, 20280 N. 59th Avenue, Suite 115-716, Glendale, Arizona 85308. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 8/22/2019. (REK)
July 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Defendants' application for attorneys' fees (Doc. 60 ) is granted in part; and (2) The amount of fees to be awarded is $2,041, with the obligation owed jointly and severally by Plaintiff and the Wilenchik Firm [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 7/29/19. (MAW)
July 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Withdraw as Co-Counsel for Plaintiff by John D. Wilenchik, Dennis I. Wilenchik, Lawrence J. Felder, and the firm of Wilenchik & Bartness, P.C. (Doc. 63 ) is denied without prejudice [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 7/1/19. (MAW)
June 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that: (1) The Wilenchik Firm's motion to withdraw (Doc. 49 ) is denied without prejudice; (2) The Fowler Firm's motion to withdraw (Doc. 51 ) is denied without prejudice; (3) Either Firm may, if it wishes to do so, re-file a withdrawal motion that attempts to satisfy the "justifiable cause" standard; and (4) Defendants' deadline to file an application for attorneys' fees pursuant to the Courts May 1, 2019 Order is June 12, 2019 [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 6/5/19. (MAW)
January 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. 23 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Counts 2, 4, and 5 of the complaint are dismissed with prejudice, Chief St. John is dismissed as a party in Count s 1 and 3, and Count 1 will be construed as a § 1983 claim for malicious prosecution. 2. The parties' stipulated motion to permit disclosure of grand jury transcript (Doc. 28 ) is GRANTED. However, the transcript must be kept confidential, may be used only for purposes of this case, and may not be shared with anybody apart from the parties and their counsel [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 1/9/19. (MAW)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Glendale, City of et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antonio Brown
Represented By: Benjamin Stephanus Kuipers
Represented By: Brian Charles Locker
Represented By: Colleen Cox Thomas
Represented By: Dennis Ira Wilenchik
Represented By: John Douglas Wilenchik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Glendale, City of
Represented By: Justin Michael Ackerman
Represented By: Joseph John Popolizio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lawrence Gonzalez
Represented By: Justin Michael Ackerman
Represented By: Joseph John Popolizio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Gonzalez
Represented By: Justin Michael Ackerman
Represented By: Joseph John Popolizio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rick St John
Represented By: Justin Michael Ackerman
Represented By: Joseph John Popolizio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?