Novak v. Department of Homeland Security
| Rick Novak |
| Department of Homeland Security, Jeff B Sessions, Thomas Homan, Enrique Lucero and Kirstjen Nielsen |
| 2:2018cv01330 |
| April 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pinal |
| John Z Boyle |
| Steven P Logan |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER that Magistrate Judge Macdonald's Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. (Doc. 43 .) It is further Ordered Petitioner Rick Novak's Amended Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under § 2241 is DENIED. (Doc. 8 .) It is further O rdered Petitioner's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 33 ) and a Renewed Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 39 ) are DENIED. It is further Ordered Petitioner's Request for Cu stody Hearing or Conditional Parole is DENIED AS MOOT. (Doc. 28 .) Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable persons could not "debate whether (o r, for that matter, agree that) the petition should have been resolved in a different manner or that the issues presented were adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further." The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case file in this matter. Signed by Senior Judge Raner C Collins on 9/11/2019. (MFR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
